Andrew Dominik's 'Killing Them Softly', based on George V Higgins' 1974 novel 'Cogan's Trade', tells the events of an illegal poker robbery and the subsequent aftermath within the gangster underworld. The film pays a good tribute to Higgin's writing style, whereby dialogue heavy scenes are presented to the reader/viewer and it is up to the audience to fish for the plot. Much of the film consists of these dialogue scenes, almost vignettes, of talk between mob men, hit men and the rest of the criminal world. The direction through these parts is superb, recalling the cool reserved direction of the 1970s just as much as some of the film's cars do. The film also contains set pieces which are quite a contrast to the dialogue scenes. A drive-by shooting, night time beat-up and car explosion are much less reserved, with slow-mo glass shatter, music and close-up shaky camera, and seem almost over eager. Surely action and violence of this sort speaks for itself and would even be more penetrating if played in the reserved (more realistic?) fashion. Instead, these scenes can feel over egged in comparison to a much better assassination scene which is much more powerful for having reserved direction. However, this is not to say that
Killing is not an extremely enjoyable crime flick that in fact I am looking forward to seeing again. Part of this is due to the well played dialogue scenes but also of the performances by Brad Pitt as hitman Jackie Cogan, Richard Jenkins as suited mob man and Scoot McNairy as out of his depth hoodlum Frankie.
However, Dominik doesnt just present us with the crime plot, but uses the world of the New Orleans gangsters to stand as microcosm representing the 'system' with the United States. Dominik does this through background radio and television commentary of the Bush Obama presidential race. How effective this mode of commentary injection is I am skeptical, surly better to have the metaphor better blended with all of films elements rather than just, effectively, a voice over. This is perhaps hard considering Higgins' novels consist heavily of talk. Perhaps if Dominick really wanted to get this point across maybe he should of created a new story and script to more effectively deliver the message, rather than playing the radio over the top and changing the location from Boston to New Orleans. Not to say that radio and location change doesn't work, it does, and the mob world of the film I think is great to watch as the metaphor they represent, but I just feel the radio does stick out from the film, so much so that you could probably remove it and be left with a great crime film.